Practice makes perfect
Future Perfect and Future Continuous
MY FUTURE LIFE
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1MrjWK8R9zswpfo6LumuuaL70Il3GZ9YPWJ3Df_a75Gw/edit?usp=sharingWebquest Frankenstein
WEBQUEST
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
EVALUATION
POOR(1) |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (1.5) |
GOOD(2) |
OUTSTANDING(2.5) |
||||||
| CONTENT QUALITY (group) |
Not organised. Little information covered. Very superficial. |
Not very organised. Covered some information requested, but no depth. |
Well organised, Covered infomation requested, but not in depth. |
Well organised. Everything was covered and give enough explanations and examples. |
|||||
| SLIDE SHOW (Group) |
Very few slides. Not engaging. No pictures nor graphics. |
Insufficient slides for the content. Few pictures and graphics. No clear organisation. |
Enough slides to present every point. Variety of pictures and formats. Organised. |
Enough slides to present every point. Variety of pictures, graphics and formats. Perfectly organised. Engage the audition's attention. |
|||||
| ORAL PRESENTATION (individual) |
Not intelligibly. No fluency. Many grammatical errors and lack of vocabulary. |
Difficult to understand at times. Some grammatical errors and some mistakes with vocab. |
Quite fluent. The mistakes are few. No hesitations. |
Very fluent with almost no problems of vocabulary or grammar. | |||||
| WORK SHARE (group) |
The members of the group do not have enough information to present the topic | Not all the members of the group have acquired the knowledge to present the topic. | Equal share of work and equal knowledge, though not in the same depth. | All the members have acquired the knowledge needed to present the topic. |
Suscribirse a:
Comentarios (Atom)